20世纪80年代，三个怀有热情和梦想的年轻人在高等学府燕京大学的校园内相遇，从此展开了他们长达三十年的友谊和梦想征途。出生于留学世家的孟晓骏（邓超 饰）渴望站在美国的土地上改变世界，浪漫自由的王阳（佟大为 饰）尽情享受改革开放初期那蓬勃激昂的青春气息，曾两次高考落榜的农村青年成冬青（黄晓明 饰）以晓骏为目标努力求学，并收获了美好的爱情。然而三个好友最终只有晓骏获得美国签证，现实和梦想的巨大差距让冬青和王阳倍受打击。偶然机缘，被开除公职的冬青在王阳的帮助下办起了英语培训学校，开始品尝到成功的喜悦。在美国发展不顺的晓骏回国，并加入学校，无疑推动三个好友朝着梦想迈进了一大步。
只是随着成功的降临，他们的友情也开始承受严峻的考验……
成东青为了再考一次大学向妈妈下跪，反映了大丈夫能屈能伸，“中国的英雄是可以跪的，甚至可以从别人的胯下钻过去”；美国人的超级英雄永不下跪.
在电影《中国合伙人》中，成东青为了再考一次大学向母亲下跪，这一情节生动地展现了中美文化对“英雄”形象的不同理解与诠释。
1. 中国文化中的英雄观
能屈能伸的英雄：
中国传统文化强调“大丈夫能屈能伸”的精神，认为英雄不只是威风凛凛的象征，更是能忍辱负重、隐忍坚持的楷模。历史上，“韩信胯下之辱”的故事被传颂，表达了只要最终能够实现目标，暂时的低头和忍让是值得的。家庭伦理与孝道：
成东青向母亲下跪，是传统孝道文化的体现。在中国文化中，下跪是一种极具象征意义的行为，表示对长辈的绝对尊重和感恩，这与中国强调家庭关系和伦理秩序的传统一脉相承。
2. 美国文化中的超级英雄观
不屈不挠的英雄形象：
相较之下，美国的超级英雄文化更加强调“永不屈服”的精神。英雄代表正义与力量，他们通常被塑造为坚定不移、绝不低头的形象。这种特质反映了美国文化中个人主义和自我奋斗的价值观。独立与自尊的核心价值：
美国文化中，跪下可能被视为一种屈辱或软弱。因此，在美国的叙事传统中，英雄往往通过不妥协和直面挑战来获得尊重与胜利。
3. 跨文化解读与启示
文化背景对英雄定义的影响：
成东青的行为虽然在中国语境中是英雄隐忍和坚持的表现，但可能在美国文化中被解读为一种软弱或过度依赖他人。家庭与个人的差异：
成东青的下跪行为不仅展现了中国文化中家庭观念的重要性，也与美国文化中个人独立至上的观念形成鲜明对比。
4. 总结
成东青的跪行为观众提供了一个反思文化差异的窗口：
在中国文化中，英雄可以低头，但最终会以“忍辱负重”的方式实现目标；
在美国文化中，英雄则是“不屈的斗士”，更强调个人意志的不可动摇。
通过理解这种文化差异，观众可以更深刻地体会到文化背景如何影响人们对英雄气质的定义与期待。
In the movie American Dreams in China, Cheng Dongqing kneeling before his mother to request another chance at taking the college entrance exam vividly highlights the contrasting interpretations of heroism in Chinese and American cultures.
1. The Chinese Concept of Heroism
A Hero Who Can Endure:
Traditional Chinese culture emphasizes the virtue of "being able to bend and stretch." A hero is not only a symbol of power but also a paragon of patience and resilience. Stories like Han Xin enduring the humiliation of crawling under someone’s legs are celebrated, reflecting the belief that temporary submission is worthwhile if it leads to ultimate success.Filial Piety and Family Ethics:
Cheng’s act of kneeling before his mother symbolizes filial piety, a cornerstone of Chinese culture. Kneeling is a powerful gesture that conveys utmost respect and gratitude toward one’s elders, aligning with the traditional values of family harmony and hierarchical order.
2. The American Concept of Superheroism
Unyielding Heroes:
In contrast, American superhero culture emphasizes an "unyielding spirit." Heroes represent justice and strength, often portrayed as unwavering and refusing to bow to any adversity. This reflects the American cultural emphasis on individualism and the relentless pursuit of personal goals.Independence and Self-Respect:
In American culture, kneeling is often associated with submission or weakness. Hence, heroes in American narratives are typically respected for their refusal to compromise or back down, even in the face of overwhelming odds.
3. Cross-Cultural Interpretation and Insights
Cultural Context Shapes Heroism:
Cheng’s behavior, which signifies perseverance and resilience in a Chinese context, might be perceived as weakness or dependency in an American context.Family vs. Individual Values:
Cheng’s kneeling reflects the importance of family ties in Chinese culture, whereas American culture places more emphasis on personal independence and self-reliance.
4. Conclusion
Cheng’s kneeling offers a lens through which to explore cultural differences:
In Chinese culture, a hero can endure temporary humiliation, ultimately achieving their goals through resilience and sacrifice.
In American culture, a hero is a “fighter” who stands firm and embodies unshakable personal willpower.
Understanding these cultural differences allows audiences to appreciate how deeply cultural contexts influence the way heroism is defined and celebrated.
中美谈判片段：以个体主义文化价值观为代表的美方较多采取自我防卫、控制和竞争的模式，他们根据事实和数据进行逻辑推理，使用威胁、警告、强迫等语言手段，再根据具体情况，做出妥协和让步，从而解决冲突。例如:电影中美方女谈判官咄咄逼人的控诉新梦想培训机构有盗窃美国材料以及在托福和美国研究生考试中作弊嫌疑。而以集体主义文化价值观为代表的中方较多地采取规避、全面考虑和妥协及突破集体主义文化规范中对情感表达采取克制的制约等模式，电影中中方承认意识到自己的失误并愿意赔偿，同时指出美方自身的错误，并提出与其长期合作的意愿。最终中美双方采纳妥协式互动方式，双方在利益得失上权衡利弊，相互让步达成协议化解了冲突。
在电影《中国合伙人》中，中美谈判情节展现了以个体主义和集体主义为核心的两种文化价值观在冲突解决中的差异。这种文化现象反映了不同社会背景下谈判策略、沟通方式以及冲突管理风格的显著差异。
1. 美方的个体主义谈判风格
自我防卫与逻辑至上：
美方谈判代表的咄咄逼人和直接控诉体现了个体主义文化对自我利益的重视。在这种文化中，谈判被视为一种竞争性活动，强调通过逻辑推理和数据支持自己的立场。语言手段与威胁策略：
美方谈判官使用威胁、警告等语言手段来施加压力，并在需要时做出有限让步。这种方式强调掌控谈判节奏和结果，力求为己方争取最大利益。
2. 中方的集体主义谈判风格
规避与全面考虑：
中方谈判代表在面对指控时展现出克制与平和的态度，承认失误并愿意赔偿。这反映了集体主义文化中的规避冲突和维护关系的倾向。情感表达的克制与妥协：
集体主义文化倾向于抑制情感表达，尤其在正式场合。这种克制有助于在谈判中展示诚意，同时通过提出长期合作的意愿来实现利益最大化。
3. 跨文化互动中的妥协与平衡
最终，中美双方采用妥协式互动方式，通过利益权衡达成协议。这种结果说明：
利益驱动的文化共识：
尽管双方文化背景不同，但经济利益是跨文化谈判中的共同目标。通过利益驱动，双方都愿意在各自立场上适当让步。文化适应的关键：
美方适当缓和了直接对抗的语气，中方也打破了传统的完全规避策略，表现出灵活性。这种互动反映了在跨文化环境中，文化适应和相互理解的重要性。
4. 总结
电影中的中美谈判情节以典型的文化模式展现了个体主义与集体主义在沟通和冲突解决中的差异：
个体主义强调直接性和逻辑性，通过竞争获得最大化利益；
集体主义则重视关系与和谐，通过妥协实现长期合作。
这为跨文化谈判提供了重要启示，即在谈判中，理解并尊重文化差异，灵活调整策略，才能实现共赢的局面。
The negotiation scene in American Dreams in China vividly illustrates the cultural differences between individualism and collectivism in conflict resolution. These differences reflect the distinct strategies, communication styles, and conflict management approaches shaped by varying cultural backgrounds.
1. Individualistic Negotiation Style of the U.S.
Self-Defense and Logic:
The assertive and accusatory approach of the American negotiators highlights the individualistic culture's emphasis on self-interest. In this culture, negotiation is viewed as a competitive activity where logic and data are used to justify one’s stance.Use of Threats and Pressure Tactics:
The American negotiators employed language strategies like threats and warnings to exert pressure, making calculated compromises only when necessary. This approach seeks to maintain control over the negotiation process and secure maximum benefits.
2. Collectivist Negotiation Style of China
Avoidance and Holistic Thinking:
The Chinese negotiators responded to accusations with restraint and calmness, admitting faults and offering compensation. This reflects the collectivist culture’s preference for avoiding direct conflict and maintaining harmonious relationships.Emotional Restraint and Compromise:
Collectivist cultures often suppress emotional expressions, especially in formal settings. This restraint demonstrates sincerity and a focus on the bigger picture, as evidenced by the proposal for long-term cooperation.
3. Compromise and Balance in Cross-Cultural Interaction
Ultimately, both sides adopted a compromise-based interaction, reaching an agreement through mutual concessions. This resolution highlights:
Shared Focus on Economic Interests:
Despite cultural differences, economic interests serve as a common ground in cross-cultural negotiations. Both sides were willing to make concessions for mutual benefit.Cultural Adaptation as a Key to Success:
The U.S. negotiators softened their confrontational tone, while the Chinese negotiators demonstrated flexibility by moving beyond traditional avoidance strategies. This adaptability underscores the importance of cultural understanding in achieving successful cross-cultural outcomes.
4. Conclusion
The negotiation scene in the movie exemplifies the distinct cultural patterns of individualism and collectivism in communication and conflict resolution:
Individualism prioritizes directness and logic, using competitive tactics to maximize benefits.
Collectivism values relationships and harmony, leveraging compromise to achieve long-term goals.
This serves as a crucial lesson for cross-cultural negotiations: understanding and respecting cultural differences while adjusting strategies can pave the way for win-win solutions.
本文由
中外文化交流
提供，采用 知识共享署名4.0
国际许可协议进行许可
本站文章除注明转载/出处外，均为本站原创或翻译，转载前请务必署名
最后编辑时间为:
2024年11月25日